Actually, it was the whole 'cloth' simulation of hairs that was broken,
since grid data could not be initialized correctly.
Stupid mistake from looptri conversion, rBc582e186d90291a19a4e404111c492f1fd2c41a4
Note that the collision modifier doesn't have any use for Loop indices,
so to avoid duplicating the loop array too,
MVertTri has been added which simply stores vertex indices (runtime only).
as complicated as before cloth solver changes.
Still doesn't solve the collapsing cloth cube issue mentioned in T43406,
probably the bending springs work somewhat differently now.
This was disabled during the course of hair dynamics work. The cloth
collision solution is based on a secondary velocity-only solver step.
While this approach is usable in general, the collision response
calculation still does not work well for hair meshes. Better contact
point generation is needed here (Bullet) and preferably an improved
solver for unilateral constraints.
These were used as UI buttons during development. If such parameters are
needed again later they should instead be added in the (now global)
SimDebugData and made accessible with a dev addon or so.
This way it doesn't have to be stored as DNA runtime pointers or passed
down as a function argument. Currently there is now no property or
button to enable debugging, this will be added again later.
Cloth data is used both for hair and actual cloth, which makes things
really difficult. The face number was used for distinguishing the two
types (no faces == hair mesh), but the extra hair data necessary for
hair sim is generated by particles and not available for edge-only cloth
meshes. This really needs to be sanitized ...
Conflicts:
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
approach does not work very well.
Using a cross section estimate still causes large oscillations due to
varying hair force based on angles. It also requires a sensible hair
thickness value (particle radius) which is difficult to control and
visualize at this point.
The new model is based purely on per-vertex forces, which seems to be
much more stable. It's also somewhat justified by the fact that each
hair vertex represents a certain mass.
Conflicts:
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
The previous calculation was modulated with the angle between the wind
direction and the segments, which leads to very oscillating behavior.
Now the formula includes an estimate for the geometric cross section
of a hair segment based on the incident angle and the hair thickness
(currently just the particle size). This gives a more stable behavior
and more realistic response to wind.
Conflicts:
source/blender/blenkernel/intern/particle_system.c
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
A stupid hack is needed here, changing the way the factor is applied to
angular bending springs. In cloth sim the bending factor of individual
springs is applied as a mix value between the bending stiffness and a
max value, but this max value isn't even used in hair sim so that
approach becomes useless.
Conflicts:
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
This helps to create some variation in a hair system, which can
otherwise become very uniform and boring. It's yet another confusing
setting in a system that should have been nodified, but only option for
now (broken windows ...)
Conflicts:
source/blender/blenkernel/intern/particle_system.c
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
to support multiple hash identifiers.
Using explicit hashing functions for every sim debug call defeats the
purpose of having a quick feedback system. Now this can be done simply
by passing an arbitrary number of hash inputs (integers) at the end of
the function calls, which are then combined by a system of variadic
macros (based on the ELEM feature). Up to 8 identifiers are supported
currently, but more could be added easily if needed.
Conflicts:
source/blender/blenkernel/intern/particle_system.c
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
samples.
This is just an intermediate method to make sure the density is valid.
Eventually the closest-point method should be used, but for testing
the poisson solver this is easier to debug.
Conflicts:
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
This allows setting a target density which the fluid simulation will
take into account as an additional term in the pressure Poisson
equation. Based on two papers
"Detail Preserving Continuum Simulation of Straight Hair" (McAdams et al. 2009)
and
"Two-way Coupled SPH and Particle Level Set Fluid Simulation" (Losasso et al. 2008)
Currently the target pressure is specified directly, but it will be
a lot more convenient to define this in terms of a geometric value such
as "number of hairs per area" (combined with hair "thickness").
Conflicts:
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
on the grid.
This uses the Eigen conjugate-gradient solver to solve the implicit
Poisson equation for the pressure Laplacian:
div(grad(p)) = div(v)
As described in "Detail Preserving Continuum Simulation of Straight Hair"
(McAdams, Selle, 2009).
Conflicts:
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
This is a bit more awkward for artists to use, but necessary for
a stable solution of the hair continuum calculation. The grid size is
defined by the user, the extent of the grid is then calculated based on
the hair geometry. A hard upper limit prevents bad memory allocation
in case too small values are entered.
Conflicts:
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
This is an artifact of earlier attempts to implement velocity smoothing,
but doesn't work anyway.
Conflicts:
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
This is based on the paper
"Detail Preserving Continuum Simulation of Straight Hair"
(McAdams, Selle, Ward, 2009)
The main difference is that hair line segments are used rather than only
rasterizing velocity at the vertices. This gives a much better coverage
of the hair volume grid, otherwise gaps can be produced at smaller grid
cell sizes and the distribution is uneven along the hair curve.
The algorithm for rasterizing is a variation of Bresenham's algorithm
extended onto 3D grids.
Conflicts:
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
solver step.
Calculating forces and jacobians from linearly interpolated grid values
is problematic due to discontinuities at the grid boundaries. The new
approach of modifying velocities after the backward euler solver step
was suggested in a newer paper
"Detail Preserving Continuum Simulation of Straight Hair"
(McAdams, Selle 2009)
Conflicts:
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
This is not necessary: the implicit solver data can keep track instead
of how many off-diagonal matrix blocks are in use (provided the
allocation limit is calculated correctly). Every time a spring is
created it then simply increments this counter and uses the block index
locally - no need to store this persistently.
