This is meant to add something to the sub-panel when it is empty
so it looks more purposeful, but also add a hint that might be helpful
when figuring out how to output a named attribute.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12715
Instance IDs serve no purpose for rendering when they aren't stable from
one frame to the next, and if the index is used in the end anyway, there
is no point in storing a vector of IDs and copying it around.
This commit exposes the `id` attribute on the instances component,
makes it optional-- only generated by default with the distribute points
on faces node.
Since the string to curves node only added the index as each instance's
ID, I removed it. This means that it would be necessary to add the ID
data manually if the initial index actually helps (when deleting only
certain characters, for example).
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12980
This adds attribute search to the geometry nodes modifier
for the input and output attributes. The "New" search item
is only shown for the output attributes.
Some of the attribute search code is extracted to a new file
in the interface code, to avoid some code duplication.
The UI code required two fixes so that the search would work
for dynamic length strings (IDProperties do not have a fixed size).
Since this does changes to the UI layout of the modifier, I also
addressed T91485 here.
Differential Revisiion: https://developer.blender.org/D12788
There were some issues when multiple inputs of the same node
were forced to be computed (e.g. for the spreadsheet), but none
of the node outputs (if existant) were used. Essentially the node
was marked as "finished" too early in this case.
This fix is necessary for the improved viewer node (T92167).
This commit removes the implicit conversion from points to a mesh
that used to happen before the next modifier. It also removes the
implicit realizing of instances that happened before another modifier.
Now we have specific nodes for both of these operations, the
implicit conversions make less sense, and implicit instance
realizing has already been removed in other nodes.
This adds another geometry nodes modifier before modifiers that would
have realized instances implicitly before. Currently adding another
data-block during versioning after linking means that an assert needs
to be changed. That should be made unnecessary by T92333.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12722
Previously, some multi-functions were allocated in a resource scope.
This was fine as long as the multi-functions were only needed during
the current evaluation of the node tree. However, now cases arise
that require the multi-functions to be alive after the modifier is finished.
For example, we want to evaluate fields created with geometry nodes
outside of geometry nodes.
To make this work, `std::shared_ptr` has to be used in a few more places.
Realistically, this shouldn't have a noticable impact on performance.
If this does become a bottleneck in the future, we can think about ways
to make this work without using `shared_ptr` for multi-functions that
are only used once.
The sockets are not exposed in any nodes yet.
They work similar to the Object/Collection/Texture sockets,
which also just reference a data block.
Based on rB207472930834
Reviewed By: JacquesLucke
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12861
This enables fields as the official workflow for geometry nodes.
While many features are converted to use fields rather than the old
attribute workflow, many are not yet converted. In that case, the
unconverted nodes are still accessible with an experimental option.
In the coming weeks the rest of the nodes will be converted.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12672
Change the toggle to switch between an attribute and a single value to
only display for inputs that are fields, as determined statically by
the field inferencing added in rB61f3d4eb7c7db7. This means the field
inferencing must be calculated on file load, since it's used in the UI.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12623
In a sub-panel it will be clearer that they are outputs, since they
just look like more inputs now. Unfortunately it is not possible to
make sub-panels display conditionally currently, so the output
sub-panel will always be visible whether or not it is empty.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12653
This patch allows passing a field to the modifier as output. In the
modifier, the user can choose an attribute name. The attribute
will be filled with values computed by the field. This only works
for realized mesh/curve/point data. As mentioned in T91376, the
output domain is selected in the node group itself. We might want
to add this functionality to the modifier later as well, but not now.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12644
This commit adds warning messages to "legacy" nodes that will be
removed in the future. The warning is shown in the node header, but
it is not printed in the terminal or displayed in the modifier. It is
also not propogated to node groups, but that is a more general task.
If the modifier's node tree has executed a deprecated node, it will
display a warning and a "Search" button that will select the nodes and
pan to them in the node editor. This doesn't open child node trees and
select nodes in there, because I want to keep this operator simple and
avoid wasting a lot of time perfecting this behavior.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12454
An issue with the previous commit-- the default value of the type was
used instead of the property value when the "use_attribute" property
was missing.
This adds a toggle to node group inputs exposed in the modifier to use
an attribute instead of a single value. When the toggle is pressed, the
button switches to a text button to choose an attribute name. Attribute
search isn't implemented here yet.
One confusing thing is that some values can't be driven by attributes
at all, like the size of a primitive node. In that case, we should have
a node warning, but that will be separate since it's more general.
We can also have an option to turn off this toggle in node group
input settings.
The two new properties for each input are stored with the same name
as the value, but with `"_use_attribute"` and `"_attribute_name"``
suffixes. The properties are not added for socket types that don't
support attribute input, like object sockets.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12504
With this commit, curve objects support the geometry nodes modifier.
Curves objects now evaluate to `CurveEval` unless there was a previous
implicit conversion (tessellating modifiers, mesh modifiers, or the
settings in the curve "Geometry" panel). In the new code, curves are
only considered to be the wire edges-- any generated surface is a mesh
instead, stored in the evaluated geometry set.
The consolidation of concepts mentioned above allows remove a lot of
code that had to do with maintaining the `DispList` type temporarily
for modifiers and rendering. Instead, render engines see a separate
object for the mesh from the mesh geometry component, and when the
curve object evaluates to a curve, the `CurveEval` is always used for
drawing wire edges.
However, currently the `DispList` type is still maintained and used as
an intermediate step in implicit mesh conversion. In the future, more
uses of it could be changed to use `CurveEval` and `Mesh` instead.
This is mostly not changed behavior, it is just a formalization of
existing logic after recent fixes for 2.8 versions last year and two
years ago. Also, in the future more functionality can be converted
to nodes, removing cases of implicit conversions. For more discussion
on that topic, see T89676.
The `use_fill_deform` option is removed. It has not worked properly
since 2.62, and the choice for filling a curve before or after
deformation will work much better and be clearer with a node system.
Applying the geometry nodes modifier to generate a curve is not
implemented with this commit, so applying the modifier won't work
at all. This is a separate technical challenge, and should be solved
in a separate step.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11597
This commit allows connecting color sockets to the group input and
changing the input values in the modifier. Before there was an error
since this was more complicated to support with the previous IDProperty
UI data storage method.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12437
This implements the initial core framework for fields and anonymous
attributes (also see T91274).
The new functionality is hidden behind the "Geometry Nodes Fields"
feature flag. When enabled in the user preferences, the following
new nodes become available: `Position`, `Index`, `Normal`,
`Set Position` and `Attribute Capture`.
Socket inspection has not been updated to work with fields yet.
Besides these changes at the user level, this patch contains the
ground work for:
* building and evaluating fields at run-time (`FN_fields.hh`) and
* creating and accessing anonymous attributes on geometry
(`BKE_anonymous_attribute.h`).
For evaluating fields we use a new so called multi-function procedure
(`FN_multi_function_procedure.hh`). It allows composing multi-functions
in arbitrary ways and supports efficient evaluation as is required by
fields. See `FN_multi_function_procedure.hh` for more details on how
this evaluation mechanism can be used.
A new `AttributeIDRef` has been added which allows handling named
and anonymous attributes in the same way in many places.
Hans and I worked on this patch together.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12414
The storage of IDProperty UI data (min, max, default value, etc) is
quite complicated. For every property, retrieving a single one of these
values involves three string lookups. First for the "_RNA_UI" group
property, then another for a group with the property's name, then for
the data value name. Not only is this inefficient, it's hard to reason
about, unintuitive, and not at all self-explanatory.
This commit replaces that system with a UI data struct directly in the
IDProperty. If it's not used, the only cost is of a NULL pointer. Beyond
storing the description, name, and RNA subtype, derived structs are used
to store type specific UI data like min and max.
Note that this means that addons using (abusing) the `_RNA_UI` custom
property will have to be changed. A few places in the addons repository
will be changed after this commit with D9919.
**Before**
Before, first the _RNA_UI subgroup is retrieved the _RNA_UI group,
then the subgroup for the original property, then specific UI data
is accessed like any other IDProperty.
```
prop = rna_idprop_ui_prop_get(idproperties_owner, "prop_name", create=True)
prop["min"] = 1.0
```
**After**
After, the `id_properties_ui` function for RNA structs returns a python
object specifically for managing an IDProperty's UI data.
```
ui_data = idproperties_owner.id_properties_ui("prop_name")
ui_data.update(min=1.0)
```
In addition to `update`, there are now other functions:
- `as_dict`: Returns a dictionary of the property's UI data.
- `clear`: Removes the property's UI data.
- `update_from`: Copy UI data between properties,
even if they have different owners.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D9697
The multi-function network system was able to compose multiple
multi-functions into a new one and to evaluate that efficiently.
This functionality was heavily used by the particle nodes prototype
a year ago. However, since then we only used multi-functions
without the need to compose them in geometry nodes.
The upcoming "fields" in geometry nodes will need a way to
compose multi-functions again. Unfortunately, the code removed
in this commit was not ideal for this different kind of function
composition. I've been working on an alternative that will be added
separately when it becomes needed.
I've had to update all the function nodes, because their interface
depended on the multi-function network data structure a bit.
The actual multi-function implementations are still the same though.
With this commit, node warnings added to nodes during evaluation
(not "Info" warnings) will also draw in the modifier. In the future
there could be a "search for this node" button as well.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11983
This commit moves the storage of `bDeformGroup` and the active index
to `Mesh`, `Lattice`, and `bGPdata` instead of `Object`. Utility
functions are added to allow easy access to the vertex groups given
an object or an ID.
As explained in T88951, the list of vertex group names is currently
stored separately per object, even though vertex group data is stored
on the geometry. This tends to complicate code and cause bugs,
especially as geometry is created procedurally and tied less closely
to an object.
The "Copy Vertex Groups to Linked" operator is removed, since they
are stored on the geometry anyway.
This patch leaves the object-level python API for vertex groups in
place. Creating a geometry-level RNA API can be a separate step;
the changes in this commit are invasive enough as it is.
Note that opening a file saved in 3.0 in an earlier version means
the vertex groups will not be available.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11689
The original assumption that the `modifyMesh` function is only
called when the modifier is applied was wrong. There are still a
couple of other places calling it through `BKE_modifier_modify_mesh`.
Now there is an extra check that makes sure instances are only
realized when the modifier is actually applied.
Many ui features for geometry nodes need access to information generated
during evaluation:
* Node warnings.
* Attribute search.
* Viewer node.
* Socket inspection (not in master yet).
The way we logged the required information before had some disadvantages:
* Viewer node used a completely separate system from node warnings and
attribute search.
* Most of the context of logged information is lost when e.g. the same node
group is used multiple times.
* A global lock was needed every time something is logged.
This new implementation solves these problems:
* All four mentioned ui features use the same underlying logging system.
* All context information for logged values is kept intact.
* Every thread has its own local logger. The logged informatiton is combined
in the end.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11785
This adds a viewer node similar to the one in the compositor.
The icon in the headers of nodes is removed because it served
the same purpose and is not necessary anymore.
Node outputs can be connected to the active viewer using
ctrl+shift+LMB, just like in the compositor. Right now this collides
with the shortcut used in the node wrangler addon, which will
be changed separately.
As of now, the viewed geometry is only visible in the spreadsheet.
Viewport visualization will be added separately.
There are a couple of benefits of using a viewer node compared
to the old approach with the icon in the node header:
* Better support for nodes that have more than one geometry output.
* It's more consistent with the compositor.
* If attributes become decoupled from geometry in the future,
the viewer can have a separate input for the attribute to visualize.
* The viewer node could potentially have visualization settings.
* Allows to keep "visualization points" around by having multiple
viewer nodes.
* Less visual clutter in node headers.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11470
* Reduce code duplication.
* Give methods more standardized names (e.g. `move_to_initialized` -> `move_assign`).
* Support wrapping arbitrary C++ types, even those that e.g. are not copyable.
This allows choosing material and texture sockets for the group input
node in the modifier. Note that currently grease pencil materials are
displayed in the list, even though grease pencil data is not supported
yet by geometry nodes. That is more complicated to fix in this case,
since we use IDProperties to store the dynamic exposed inputs.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11393
This issue was that `BKE_object_eval_uber_data` was not called for
the text object, because its geometry was not dependent upon
and its `is_directly_visible` tag was `false`. The crash happens in
rendering code, because the evaluated data is missing.
This not only affects text objects, but all object types that have a
geometry component that geometry nodes does not support yet.
The solution is to just add the missing dependencies.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11385
Those were mostly just left over from previous work on particle nodes.
They solved the problem of keeping a reference to an object over
multiple frames and in a cache. Currently, we do not have this problem
in geometry nodes, so we can also remove this layer of complexity
for now.
This patch adds initial curve support to geometry nodes. Currently
there is only one node available, the "Curve to Mesh" node, T87428.
However, the aim of the changes here is larger than just supporting
curve data in nodes-- it also uses the opportunity to add better spline
data structures, intended to replace the existing curve evaluation code.
The curve code in Blender is quite old, and it's generally regarded as
some of the messiest, hardest-to-understand code as well. The classes
in `BKE_spline.hh` aim to be faster, more extensible, and much more
easily understandable. Further explanation can be found in comments in
that file.
Initial builtin spline attributes are supported-- reading and writing
from the `cyclic` and `resolution` attributes works with any of the
attribute nodes. Also, only Z-up normal calculation is implemented
at the moment, and tilts do not apply yet.
**Limitations**
- For now, you must bring curves into the node tree with an "Object
Info" node. Changes to the curve modifier stack will come later.
- Converting to a mesh is necessary to visualize the curve data.
Further progress can be tracked in: T87245
Higher level design document: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Modules/Physics_Nodes/Projects/EverythingNodes/CurveNodes
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11091
This is a first step towards T87620.
It should not have any functional changes.
Goals of this refactor:
* Move the evaluator out of `MOD_nodes.cc`. That makes it easier to
improve it in isolation.
* Extract core input/out parameter management out of `GeoNodeExecParams`.
Managing this is the responsibility of the evaluator. This separation of
concerns will be useful once we have lazy evaluation of certain inputs/outputs.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11085
This allows us to remove a callback from the modifier type info struct.
In the future the these modifiers might just be replaced by nodes
internally anyway, but in the meantime it's nice to unify the handling
of evaluated geometry a bit.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11080
This fixes T87666 and T83252.
The boolean modifier and geometry nodes can depend on the geometry
of an entire collection. Before, the modifiers had to manually create relations
to all the objects in the collection. This worked for the most part, but was
cumbersome and did not solve all issues. For example, the modifiers were not
properly updated when objects were added/removed from the referenced collection.
This commit introduces the concept of "collection geometry" in the depsgraph.
The geometry of a collection depends on the transforms and geometry of all
the objects in it. The boolean modifier and geometry nodes can now just depend
on the collection geometry instead of creating all the dependencies themselves.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11053
Under some circumstances, modifiers are evaluated more than once.
One time to compute the actual output geometry and another time
with `MOD_APPLY_ORCO`. This design probably has to be revisited
at some point in the context of geometry nodes. However, that would
be much more involved than a bug fix.
The issue was that during the second evaluation, the node tree is
evaluated based on a slightly different input geometry. The data
generated during the second evaluation overwrote the cached
data from the first evaluation, resulting in incorrect data that is
shown in the spreadsheet.
The fix for now is to simply not log any data in the second evaluation.
