Glossary cleanup #45889

Closed
opened 2015-08-24 09:23:09 +02:00 by gandalf3 · 12 comments
Member

Many of the definitions in the glossary are phrased inconsistently.
Perhaps a "template" style should be decided on for glossary entries to ensure consistency?

I've split this up into subtasks:

  1. Define a style guide which specifies what makes a glossary entry and general writing style (#45893)
  2. Remove glossary entries which shouldn't be in the glossary (#45894)
  3. Make remaining entires conform to the guidelines (#45895)
Many of the definitions in the glossary are phrased inconsistently. Perhaps a "template" style should be decided on for glossary entries to ensure consistency? I've split this up into subtasks: 1. Define a style guide which specifies what makes a glossary entry and general writing style (#45893) 2. Remove glossary entries which shouldn't be in the glossary (#45894) 3. Make remaining entires conform to the guidelines (#45895)
Author
Member

Changed status to: 'Open'

Changed status to: 'Open'
Author
Member

Added subscriber: @gandalf3

Added subscriber: @gandalf3
Member

Added subscriber: @GregZaal

Added subscriber: @GregZaal

Added subscriber: @ideasman42

Added subscriber: @ideasman42

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Archived'

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Archived'
Campbell Barton self-assigned this 2015-08-25 00:53:09 +02:00

@gandalf3, re "Many of the definitions in the glossary are phrased inconsistently."

This is too vague, I rather keep tasks here tangible - so its obvious when its resolved and we can close.

Please list which descriptions need edits.

@gandalf3, re *"Many of the definitions in the glossary are phrased inconsistently."* This is too vague, I rather keep tasks here tangible - so its obvious when its resolved and we can close. Please list which descriptions need edits.
Author
Member

@ideasman42

There doesn't appear to be a standard or any particular style which is adhered to. This doesn't really make any of the writing styles wrong, just different from one another.
I think it would be good to decide on some template/guidelines to follow, then change all of them to match that.

For example, perhaps prepending "it's" or "is" should be discouraged. IMO this is redundant and adds noise right at the start of the definition.

Aside from this, there are also many many specific cases where something is very wrong/inaccurate/otherwise bad. For instance:

Collapse, Subdivision surface: Not sure these really need a glossary entry?

Topology: Duplicate entries, just needs cleanup

Actuator, Boolean, Constraint and many more: Rather awkward and in some cases misleading definitions

@ideasman42 There doesn't appear to be a standard or any particular style which is adhered to. This doesn't really make any of the writing styles *wrong*, just different from one another. I think it would be good to decide on some template/guidelines to follow, then change all of them to match that. For example, perhaps prepending "it's" or "is" should be discouraged. IMO this is redundant and adds noise right at the start of the definition. Aside from this, there are also many many specific cases where something is very wrong/inaccurate/otherwise bad. For instance: *Collapse*, *Subdivision surface*: Not sure these really need a glossary entry? *Topology*: Duplicate entries, just needs cleanup *Actuator*, *Boolean*, *Constraint* and many more: Rather awkward and in some cases misleading definitions
Author
Member

Changed status from 'Archived' to: 'Open'

Changed status from 'Archived' to: 'Open'
gandalf3 reopened this issue 2015-08-25 04:08:32 +02:00
Author
Member

Splitting up into subtasks

Splitting up into subtasks
Campbell Barton was unassigned by gandalf3 2015-08-25 04:09:14 +02:00
gandalf3 self-assigned this 2015-08-25 04:09:14 +02:00
gandalf3 removed their assignment 2015-08-25 04:20:43 +02:00
Author
Member

Sorry about the email spam, but I've now arranged this task into three tasks and edited the description to reflect this.

@ideasman42 Is this better?

Sorry about the email spam, but I've now arranged this task into three tasks and edited the description to reflect this. @ideasman42 Is this better?
Author
Member

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Resolved'

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Resolved'
gandalf3 self-assigned this 2015-09-10 10:41:56 +02:00
Author
Member

As each subtask has now been taken care of, think this is resolved.

As each subtask has now been taken care of, think this is resolved.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender-manual#45889
No description provided.