Cleanup: Avoid recheck span part if is already confirmed range #108284

Closed
Iliya Katushenock wants to merge 3 commits from mod_moder:tmp_avoid_rechecking_already_confirmed_range into main

When changing the target branch, be careful to rebase the branch in your fork to match. See documentation.

We already know if range_threshold-size part of span
start is range. Complexity find_size_of_next_range depend
on span size, better to avoid checking of first part if it is definetly range.

We already know if `range_threshold`-size part of span start is range. Complexity `find_size_of_next_range` depend on span size, better to avoid checking of first part if it is definetly range.
Iliya Katushenock added 1 commit 2023-05-25 18:09:09 +02:00
Author
Member

As i can see, range_threshold can be << than remaining_indices.size().
This mean, non_empty_as_range_try can fail, but non_empty_is_range(remaining_indices.take_front(range_threshold))
can be true multiple time in sequence. It would be better to use bisect lookup of end of this range, or just call ^ in loop.
Also it possible to added slice(range_threshold) as individual range each time in the main while loop.

As i can see, `range_threshold` can be << than `remaining_indices.size()`. This mean, `non_empty_as_range_try` can fail, but `non_empty_is_range(remaining_indices.take_front(range_threshold))` can be true multiple time in sequence. It would be better to use bisect lookup of end of this range, or just call ^ in loop. Also it possible to added `slice(range_threshold)` as individual range each time in the main while loop.
Iliya Katushenock requested review from Jacques Lucke 2023-05-25 18:09:30 +02:00
Jacques Lucke reviewed 2023-05-25 18:13:42 +02:00
@ -130,2 +130,4 @@
if (non_empty_is_range(remaining_indices.take_front(range_threshold))) {
/* Next segment is a range. Now find the place where the range ends. */
const T segment_start = remaining_indices.first();
remaining_indices = remaining_indices.drop_front(range_threshold);
Member

Generally seems reasonable to not check those indices again. Didn't test this yet, but it seems like the segment_size computed below is now too small. range_threshold has to be added to it, no?

Generally seems reasonable to not check those indices again. Didn't test this yet, but it seems like the `segment_size` computed below is now too small. `range_threshold` has to be added to it, no?
Author
Member

Op, yes, forgot!

Op, yes, forgot!
mod_moder marked this conversation as resolved
Iliya Katushenock added 1 commit 2023-05-25 18:16:37 +02:00
Iliya Katushenock added 1 commit 2023-05-25 18:28:36 +02:00
Jacques Lucke reviewed 2023-05-25 18:29:58 +02:00
@ -52,3 +52,1 @@
Array<int> data = {1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24};
Vector<std::variant<IndexRange, Span<int>>> parts;
const int64_t parts_num = split_to_ranges_and_spans<int>(data, 3, parts);
Array<int> data_1 = {1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24};
Member

Instead of naming variables _1 and _2 you can simply create a nested { ... } block for each test case.

Instead of naming variables `_1` and `_2` you can simply create a nested `{ ... }` block for each test case.
Author
Member

Found a problem in my approach. Later I will make the version described in the comment above.

Found a problem in my approach. Later I will make the version described in the comment above.
Iliya Katushenock deleted branch tmp_avoid_rechecking_already_confirmed_range 2023-05-25 19:55:34 +02:00

Pull request closed

Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset System
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Code Documentation
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Viewport & EEVEE
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Asset Browser Project
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Module
Viewport & EEVEE
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Severity
High
Severity
Low
Severity
Normal
Severity
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#108284
No description provided.