Fix #109021: Collection "Exclude" property lost when parent and grand-parent is disabled #109051
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender#109051
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "dfelinto:fix-109021"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
This patch started on D9849 by Dirk Wallenstein. I'm moving it here for further discussions.
I added a separate commit on top of that to handle the initialization of the flags. This is required for #109021 (although not needed for #84305).
I'm not sure:
cf2e3286d3
tof7269b9d91
By the way, I created this patch against 3.6. Though it may make more sense to have this against main, let it see if any unforeseen bug shows up, then we backport to 3.6 LTS. It depends on the confidence of the reviewer :)
I didn't really dig into the original patch by the way, I'm mostly acting as the messenger here (and tester).
The commit message of the first commit is essentially empty.
There is a critical lack of documentation (comments) about
layer_collection_flag_recursive_set
expected behavior, andLAYER_COLLECTION_PREVIOUSLY_EXCLUDED
could also use some comments about its exact meaning, with reference tolayer_collection_flag_recursive_set
.The problem of this patch is that the new behavior is just as obscure and undocumented as the original code it tries to fix. So actually understanding if it's doing what it should do is... not trivial, to say the least.
Besides that, I would rather run the
do_version
code systematically (or at least add a debug check that when not run, data is in expected state). Not sure where exactly, maybe as part ofBKE_collections_after_lib_link
, or as a new similar call next to it?Pull request closed