Fix for #8 'Operator Presets don't exists from Release 4.2' #11
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "linux_dr/add_mesh_BoltFactory:losborn_ISSUE8_missing_presets"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Fix for #8 : Restored BoltFactory presets with proper scaling, based on suggestions from @sw-tya and code from
73c82edab2
losborn_ISSUE8_missing_presetsto Fix for #8 'Operator Presets don't exists from Release 4.2'I need more time to complete the review.
So far i can see that the presets appear in the GUI list as expected. I'm testing using a local build of 4.3.0 Alpha.
Having the default as 12.5 for the Crest_Percent means that the #10 is required as well. This confused me for a while as with:
"git fetch origin pull/11/head:losborn_ISSUE8_missing_presets"
"git checkout losborn_ISSUE8_missing_presets"
The changes with the Float had gone from my folder.
I've got to do more learning on how to see both pulls at the same time (assuming that is possible)...
Yes, good catch. I hadn't realized that I had separated out the change from
IntProperty
toFloatProperty
from the change of10
to12.5
in the presets, but I obviously had. I would not do a final approval of this until #10 is merged in, and I can rebase this PR on the merge... That said, here is how to test both fixes together in the meantime:now you will have a new local branch named
swtya_combinedFixes_PR10_and_PR11
, with changes from both branches available to test simultaneouslyThank you for your astute catches
After I'd got #10 and #11 co-resident, thanks:
Tested with production Blender LTS 4.2.0 and home build 4.3.0
4.2.0 is not any worse
, that's still awaiting the directory search backport.4.3.0 works correctly. Presets all load, sizes are good. I checked against an old folder I had from a different version - files seem consistent only expected changes present.
Ship it.
@sw-tya wrote:
I don’t know anything about this directory search feature you mentioned. Can you please write a bug report issue for it, Including how it’s supposed to behave and steps to reproduce.
I’m unsure if I’ll be able to address it but at least that way it will be documented and tracked.
@nickberckley, this should be ready to rebase and merge after #10 (@sw-tya found a dependency on #10 that I missed.)
4.2.0 does not support any extension shipping with presets.
23fc0d53e1
is apparently (blender/blender#124452) in the 4.2.1 list for when that ships.
This is what I have gathered from trawling https://projects.blender.org/
I don't believe anything more can be done from the extensions world.
@linux_dr can you merge main in this PR branch?
Also remove comments about 4.3 might be backported to 4.2
@nickberckley wrote:
I have no permissions to merge any PRs. If someone wants to grant me such permissions we can stop asking you.
Update: I apologize that I misread your reply… I expect you meant for me to rebase #11 onto
main
… I hope to do that very soon… (I think i also confused #10 and #11)… I’ll get right on this.@sw-tya is the only one that mentioned 4.2 and 4.3… I’ve only been working off
main
No need to rebase anything, just in your local branch do
there shouldn't be any merge conflicts afaik. And when you're done (and remove those comments) just push normally
32ab195379
tof2d3ab9487
@sw-tya wrote:
could you edit this comment to make it something like:
4.2 is not any worse,
that's still awaiting the directory search backport.Just add a
~~
at the beginning and end of the lineThe text:
# Part of 4.3 may be back-ported to 4.2.
was copied from the Cambell Barton in:
73c82edab2
I've clarified my test versions and struck text in my previous comment.
I'll merge this and deal with any related future changes myself
Is there a reason this isn't closed yet? Is someone waiting on me to do something?
This is closed