Node Wrangler: LTS: backport many bugfixes from main #105169
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Blender Cloud
Interest
Collada
Interest
Core
Interest
Documentation
Interest
Eevee & Viewport
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
Import and Export
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds, Tests & Devices
Interest
Python API
Interest
Rendering & Cycles
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Translations
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Module
Add-ons (BF-Blender)
Module
Add-ons (Community)
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender-addons#105169
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "pioverfour/blender-addons:dp_nw_3.6"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
This PR includes many bug fixes to Node Wrangler done over the past few months. Some of these fixes relied on previous refactors, so they are included as well.
Main areas affected are the Preview and Add Reroute operators.
This was discussed with @PratikPB2123 in #105095, and a fix for that issue is included as well.
@lichtwerk ^
Please include this in #109399 so it is not forgotten
I tried to check with others if such larger refactors are fine for LTS, but havent recieved feedback yet...
I’d understand if they weren’t honestly, especially since I don’t know how to write tests for interactive tools. If the refactors are unacceptable, I could maybe still extract a few easy fixes out of this, but I won’t rewrite each commit that relies on the refactors.
Thanks for considering it anyway :)
I think this is beyond the types of bugfixes we should backport. It's too hard to review this and conclude with some certainty that it won't introduce new bugs.
07ed2593ad
tof42344c798
That’s understandable. I removed the more involved commits, and will keep them available in my personal fork.
Just to be clear, am I expected to merge this myself or must this be handled by @lichtwerk as part of LTS maintenance?
You can merge it yourself.