blender
/
blender
134
398
Fork 580
Code Issues 6.3k Pull Requests 757 Projects 19 Wiki Activity

Sculpt: Add polyline hide operator #119483

Merged
Hans Goudey merged 17 commits from Sean-Kim/blender:polyline-hide into main 2024-04-29 14:04:28 +02:00
Conversation 32 Commits 17 Files Changed 15 +440 -3
Sean Kim commented 2024-03-14 19:17:53 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

This PR adds a polyline hide operator for sculpt mode as well as the necessary generic callback code to allow using this gesture in other selection tools.

polyline-hide.gif

Added Features

  • Polyline Hide operator
  • WM_gesture_polyline_* callback functions for usage in other operators
  • Status bar text while using the polyline modal
  • Common Gesture Polyline keymap for usage with the modal

Known Limitations

  • Unlike the Box Hide and Lasso Hide operators, the Polyline Hide operator does not provide a simple shortcut to click and show all hidden elements in a mesh. This is because the existing operators operate on a click-drag action while the new operator is invoked by just a click.

Design Task: #119353

This PR adds a polyline hide operator for sculpt mode as well as the necessary generic callback code to allow using this gesture in other selection tools. ![polyline-hide.gif](/attachments/1987fd19-4f96-43d0-ba53-81a80f30fa6e) ## Added Features * *Polyline Hide* operator * `WM_gesture_polyline_*` callback functions for usage in other operators * Status bar text while using the polyline modal * Common *Gesture Polyline* keymap for usage with the modal ## Known Limitations * Unlike the *Box Hide* and *Lasso Hide* operators, the *Polyline Hide* operator does not provide a simple shortcut to click and show all hidden elements in a mesh. This is because the existing operators operate on a click-drag action while the new operator is invoked by just a click. Design Task: #119353
polyline-hide.gif
974 KiB
👍 2 ❤️ 3
Sean Kim added 2 commits 2024-03-14 19:18:02 +01:00
Sean Kim reviewed 2024-03-14 19:20:02 +01:00
source/blender/editors/sculpt_paint/sculpt_gesture.cc Outdated
@ -96,3 +96,3 @@
}
std::unique_ptr<GestureData> init_from_lasso(bContext *C, wmOperator *op)
static std::unique_ptr<GestureData> init_from_lasso(bContext *C,
Sean Kim commented 2024-03-14 19:20:02 +01:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

I'm unsure about the naming here and for a term that would encompass both types. Originally I was thinking of "border" but that term is already currently used to specifically mean box selection in other areas of Blender.

I'm unsure about the naming here and for a term that would encompass both types. Originally I was thinking of "border" but that term is already currently used to specifically mean box selection in other areas of Blender.
Sean Kim reviewed 2024-03-14 19:27:06 +01:00
source/blender/windowmanager/intern/wm_gesture.cc
@ -83,0 +83,4 @@
else if (ELEM(type, WM_GESTURE_POLYLINE)) {
gesture->points_alloc = 64;
short *border = static_cast<short int *>(
MEM_mallocN(sizeof(short[2]) * gesture->points_alloc, "polyline points"));
Sean Kim commented 2024-03-14 19:27:06 +01:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

I'm unsure of the data structure here, I was also considering using

struct PolylineData
{
   short current_pos[2];
   short *points;
}

To make the code intent more explicit, but opted instead to always store the current position in the last spot of the current array.

I'm unsure of the data structure here, I was also considering using ``` struct PolylineData { short current_pos[2]; short *points; } ``` To make the code intent more explicit, but opted instead to always store the current position in the last spot of the current array.
Sean Kim requested review from Hans Goudey 2024-03-14 19:28:59 +01:00
Sean Kim requested review from Daniel Bystedt 2024-03-14 19:29:43 +01:00
Hans Goudey reviewed 2024-03-14 19:39:28 +01:00
Hans Goudey left a comment
Member
Copy Link

Does the sculpt gesture system have to know that the polyline shape exists? Seems that the existing lasso code could be used directly by the new operators without changing anything.

Does the sculpt gesture system have to know that the polyline shape exists? Seems that the existing lasso code could be used directly by the new operators without changing anything.
source/blender/windowmanager/intern/wm_gesture_ops.cc Outdated
@ -692,0 +911,4 @@
ot->name = "Polyline Gesture";
ot->idname = "WM_OT_polyline_gesture";
ot->description = "Outline a selection area with each mouse click.";
Hans Goudey commented 2024-03-14 19:38:13 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

The period is added automatically here

The period is added automatically here
Sean-Kim marked this conversation as resolved
Hans Goudey reviewed 2024-03-14 19:42:12 +01:00
Hans Goudey left a comment
Member
Copy Link
No description provided.
Sean Kim commented 2024-03-14 20:05:04 +01:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

Does the sculpt gesture system have to know that the polyline shape exists? Seems that the existing lasso code could be used directly by the new operators without changing anything.

@HooglyBoogly That's a fair point. I thought it would be best to be explicit about them being different types for future maintenance since

static int hide_show_gesture_polyline_exec(bContext *C, wmOperator *op)
{
  std::unique_ptr<gesture::GestureData> gesture_data = gesture::init_from_lasso(C, op);
  if (!gesture_data) {
    return OPERATOR_CANCELLED;
  }
  hide_show_init_properties(*C, *gesture_data, *op);
  gesture::apply(*C, *gesture_data, *op);
  return OPERATOR_FINISHED;
}

would read to me as an error at init_from_lasso if I was more unfamiliar with the code. In the end though, I can't think of any particular usecase where the lasso and polyline code actually need to diverge within sculpt_gesture.cc

> Does the sculpt gesture system have to know that the polyline shape exists? Seems that the existing lasso code could be used directly by the new operators without changing anything. @HooglyBoogly That's a fair point. I thought it would be best to be explicit about them being different types for future maintenance since ``` static int hide_show_gesture_polyline_exec(bContext *C, wmOperator *op) { std::unique_ptr<gesture::GestureData> gesture_data = gesture::init_from_lasso(C, op); if (!gesture_data) { return OPERATOR_CANCELLED; } hide_show_init_properties(*C, *gesture_data, *op); gesture::apply(*C, *gesture_data, *op); return OPERATOR_FINISHED; } ``` would read to me as an error at `init_from_lasso` if I was more unfamiliar with the code. In the end though, I can't think of any particular usecase where the lasso and polyline code actually need to diverge within `sculpt_gesture.cc`
Hans Goudey commented 2024-03-14 20:19:20 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

would read to me as an error at init_from_lasso if I was more unfamiliar with the code. In the end though, I can't think of any particular usecase where the lasso and polyline code actually need to diverge within sculpt_gesture.cc

Right, I agree. I would have had the same instinct to make things explicit like that, but I don't think it helps us in practice and will probably end up with unnecessary boilerplate in a lot of places.

> would read to me as an error at `init_from_lasso` if I was more unfamiliar with the code. In the end though, I can't think of any particular usecase where the lasso and polyline code actually need to diverge within `sculpt_gesture.cc` Right, I agree. I would have had the same instinct to make things explicit like that, but I don't think it helps us in practice and will probably end up with unnecessary boilerplate in a lot of places.
Sean Kim requested review from Hans Goudey 2024-03-14 20:20:28 +01:00
Sean Kim commented 2024-03-14 20:21:05 +01:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

No idea what's going on with this issue - noticed it somehow removed you from the reviewer list...?

No idea what's going on with this issue - noticed it somehow removed you from the reviewer list...?
Sean Kim commented 2024-03-14 20:25:19 +01:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

Right, I agree. I would have had the same instinct to make things explicit like that, but I don't think it helps us in practice and will probably end up with unnecessary boilerplate in a lot of places.

Sounds good, I'll make the change here and consider renaming or adding other comments in sculpt_gesture.cc in a later PR to be more indicative of future usage.

> Right, I agree. I would have had the same instinct to make things explicit like that, but I don't think it helps us in practice and will probably end up with unnecessary boilerplate in a lot of places. Sounds good, I'll make the change here and consider renaming or adding other comments in `sculpt_gesture.cc` in a later PR to be more indicative of future usage.
👍 1
ThinkingPolygons commented 2024-03-14 21:40:06 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Just to make sure, to run the tool, Enter also works, right? the gif only shows the "click on first point" method

Just to make sure, to run the tool, `Enter` also works, right? the gif only shows the "click on first point" method
Sean Kim commented 2024-03-14 21:43:22 +01:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

Just to make sure, to run the tool, Enter also works, right? the gif only shows the "click on first point" method

@ThinkingPolygons - Yes, pressing enter will also submit the shape - I didn't add a GIF for that.

> Just to make sure, to run the tool, `Enter` also works, right? the gif only shows the "click on first point" method @ThinkingPolygons - Yes, pressing enter will also submit the shape - I didn't add a GIF for that.
👍 1
Sean Kim added 2 commits 2024-03-14 23:49:02 +01:00
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-lint Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-darwin-x86_64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-darwin-arm64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-linux-x86_64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-windows-amd64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-coordinator Build done. Details
7caa55393f Remove ShapeType::Polyline
Daniel Bystedt commented 2024-03-18 00:58:29 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

@Sergey @HooglyBoogly could anytone of you get @buildbot to make a build of this PR so that I can test from a users POV?

@Sergey @HooglyBoogly could anytone of you get @buildbot to make a build of this PR so that I can test from a users POV?
Hans Goudey commented 2024-03-18 03:03:16 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

@blender-bot package

@blender-bot package
Blender Bot commented 2024-03-18 03:03:19 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Package build started. Download here when ready.

Package build started. [Download here](https://builder.blender.org/download/patch/PR119483) when ready.
Daniel Bystedt commented 2024-03-19 01:06:20 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

I suspect something is wrong with the current build
https://builder.blender.org/download/patch/PR119483

When using lasso hide or polyline hide, nothing happens. I activate the tool in the toolbar, press left mouse down and drag on the screen over a spher. Nothing happens. Box hide works as intended.

I suspect something is wrong with the current build https://builder.blender.org/download/patch/PR119483 When using lasso hide or polyline hide, nothing happens. I activate the tool in the toolbar, press left mouse down and drag on the screen over a spher. Nothing happens. Box hide works as intended.
ThinkingPolygons commented 2024-03-19 01:30:22 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@DanielBystedt the polyline tool is working fine, the lasso tool is not
also, the polyline works by clicking to add points, not click and drag

@DanielBystedt the polyline tool is working fine, the lasso tool is not also, the polyline works by clicking to add points, not click and drag
Sean Kim added 1 commit 2024-03-19 01:51:06 +01:00
Sean Kim commented 2024-03-19 01:53:15 +01:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

I fixed the issue @ThinkingPolygons brought up, made a mistake with the keymap entries, so Lasso Hide should be working again. I confirmed that Polyline Hide is also working still in this build. Since I don't have permissions to kick off a new package build, could you submit another request @HooglyBoogly ?

I fixed the issue @ThinkingPolygons brought up, made a mistake with the keymap entries, so Lasso Hide should be working again. I confirmed that Polyline Hide is also working still in this build. Since I don't have permissions to kick off a new package build, could you submit another request @HooglyBoogly ?
Sean Kim closed this pull request 2024-03-19 01:53:17 +01:00
Sean Kim reopened this pull request 2024-03-19 01:53:25 +01:00
Sean Kim commented 2024-03-19 01:53:39 +01:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

Clicked the wrong button and accidentially closed it...

Clicked the wrong button and accidentially closed it...
Sean Kim added 1 commit 2024-03-19 03:42:38 +01:00
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-darwin-arm64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-darwin-x86_64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-linux-x86_64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-windows-amd64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-coordinator Build done. Details
47a7e05bf8 make format and icon change
Sean Kim changed title from WIP: Sculpt: Add polyline hide operator to Sculpt: Add polyline hide operator 2024-03-19 03:42:46 +01:00
Sean Kim commented 2024-03-19 03:44:45 +01:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

Updated and removed WIP. I've been working on making an icon for this separately, but the process is taking a bit longer than I'd like so I changed the icon here to just use the "None" placeholder.

Updated and removed WIP. I've been working on making an icon for this separately, but the process is taking a bit longer than I'd like so I changed the icon here to just use the "None" placeholder.
Hans Goudey commented 2024-03-19 13:02:33 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

@blender-bot package

@blender-bot package
Blender Bot commented 2024-03-19 13:02:36 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Package build started. Download here when ready.

Package build started. [Download here](https://builder.blender.org/download/patch/PR119483) when ready.
Sean Kim added 1 commit 2024-03-19 18:36:11 +01:00
Sean Kim added 1 commit 2024-03-19 18:49:32 +01:00
Daniel Bystedt commented 2024-03-20 23:23:19 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

In terms of functionality the polyline hide perfectly. Thanks for adding hotkey hints in the lower info bar! The tool icon is currently missing, but once there is an icon I am ready to approve the commit.

Let me know if the icon will be added in another PR for whatever reason.

In terms of functionality the polyline hide perfectly. Thanks for adding hotkey hints in the lower info bar! The tool icon is currently missing, but once there is an icon I am ready to approve the commit. Let me know if the icon will be added in another PR for whatever reason.
Sean Kim commented 2024-03-21 00:27:33 +01:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

In terms of functionality the polyline hide perfectly. Thanks for adding hotkey hints in the lower info bar! The tool icon is currently missing, but once there is an icon I am ready to approve the commit.

Let me know if the icon will be added in another PR for whatever reason.

@DanielBystedt - I was planning on adding it in a future PR since we're still in alpha for 4.2 until June 5th. If you think we need one before landing this, would a reasonable compromise here be adding it to the Sculpt menu only and changing the toolbar when the icon is done?

Edit: Ignore this, I finished the icon file recently so at this point I think this question is moot.

> In terms of functionality the polyline hide perfectly. Thanks for adding hotkey hints in the lower info bar! The tool icon is currently missing, but once there is an icon I am ready to approve the commit. > > Let me know if the icon will be added in another PR for whatever reason. ~~@DanielBystedt - I was planning on adding it in a future PR since we're still in alpha for 4.2 until June 5th. If you think we need one before landing this, would a reasonable compromise here be adding it to the `Sculpt` menu only and changing the toolbar when the icon is done?~~ Edit: Ignore this, I finished the icon file recently so at this point I think this question is moot.
Daniel Bystedt commented 2024-03-26 00:30:09 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Just a note that @JulienKaspar and @pablovazquez left some notes on the icon here
blender/blender-assets#2

Once the the icon comments are fixed I am ready to approve the PR

Just a note that @JulienKaspar and @pablovazquez left some notes on the icon here https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender-assets/pulls/2 Once the the icon comments are fixed I am ready to approve the PR
👍 1
Sean Kim added 4 commits 2024-03-29 01:18:58 +01:00
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-darwin-x86_64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-darwin-arm64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-lint Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-linux-x86_64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-windows-amd64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-coordinator Build done. Details
b4e45df791 Adjust files after merge
Daniel Bystedt commented 2024-03-31 17:28:22 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

@blender-bot package

@blender-bot package
Blender Bot commented 2024-03-31 17:28:26 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Only blender organization members with write access can start builds. See documentation for details.

Only blender organization members with write access can start builds. See [documentation](https://projects.blender.org/infrastructure/blender-bot/src/branch/main/README.md) for details.
Daniel Bystedt commented 2024-03-31 17:30:58 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

@HooglyBoogly can you make a trigger a build with blender-bot? I just want to check the build before approving the commit

@HooglyBoogly can you make a trigger a build with blender-bot? I just want to check the build before approving the commit
👍 1
Hans Goudey commented 2024-04-01 02:19:16 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

@blender-bot package

@blender-bot package
Blender Bot commented 2024-04-01 02:19:20 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Package build started. Download here when ready.

Package build started. [Download here](https://builder.blender.org/download/patch/PR119483) when ready.
ThinkingPolygons commented 2024-04-09 06:20:16 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

any news on this?

any news on this?
Sean Kim commented 2024-04-09 19:33:15 +02:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

any news on this?

@ThinkingPolygons - The icon PR was recently updated. Once that gets approved, I'll update this PR with the latest changes and then the only thing remaining should be the functional review from Hans and any changes that come from that

> any news on this? @ThinkingPolygons - The icon PR was recently updated. Once that gets approved, I'll update this PR with the latest changes and then the only thing remaining should be the functional review from Hans and any changes that come from that
👍 1
Sean Kim added 1 commit 2024-04-11 00:52:42 +02:00
Hans Goudey requested changes 2024-04-15 16:58:12 +02:00
Dismissed
Hans Goudey left a comment
Member
Copy Link

I think there's an issue with the right click select keymap, it works quite differently-- I have to hold down right click for the whole operation and add points with LMB.

I think there's an issue with the right click select keymap, it works quite differently-- I have to hold down right click for the whole operation and add points with LMB.
source/blender/editors/sculpt_paint/sculpt_intern.hh Outdated
@ -1664,0 +1664,4 @@
/* In the context of a sculpt gesture, both lasso and polyline modal
* operators are handled as the same general shape.
* TODO: Rename to polygon? */
Hans Goudey commented 2024-04-15 16:51:54 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

I think the current name is fine, at least it's not worth adding a TODO here

I think the current name is fine, at least it's not worth adding a TODO here
Sean-Kim marked this conversation as resolved
source/blender/windowmanager/intern/wm_gesture_ops.cc
@ -697,0 +809,4 @@
break;
}
const float cur[2] = {float(cur_x), float(cur_y)};
Hans Goudey commented 2024-04-15 16:56:49 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

const float2 cur(cur_x, cur_y);
same with orig

`const float2 cur(cur_x, cur_y);` same with `orig`
Sean-Kim marked this conversation as resolved
Sean Kim added 1 commit 2024-04-16 01:52:42 +02:00
Sean Kim added 1 commit 2024-04-16 02:02:07 +02:00
Sean Kim commented 2024-04-16 02:03:25 +02:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

I think there's an issue with the right click select keymap, it works quite differently-- I have to hold down right click for the whole operation and add points with LMB.

Thanks for the feedback - haven't yet addressed this in the most recent commit.

> I think there's an issue with the right click select keymap, it works quite differently-- I have to hold down right click for the whole operation and add points with LMB. Thanks for the feedback - haven't yet addressed this in the most recent commit.
Sean Kim added 1 commit 2024-04-16 17:51:44 +02:00
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-linux-x86_64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-windows-amd64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-coordinator Build done. Details
a911660e8d Fix RCS tool interaction
Sean Kim requested review from Hans Goudey 2024-04-16 17:52:06 +02:00
Sean Kim commented 2024-04-16 17:53:35 +02:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

Updated the keymap so that with RCS enabled, the interactions remain the same (i.e. starting the tool & adding points with LMB and canceling with RMB / ESC)

Updated the keymap so that with RCS enabled, the interactions remain the same (i.e. starting the tool & adding points with LMB and canceling with RMB / ESC)
Hans Goudey approved these changes 2024-04-16 18:11:22 +02:00
Hans Goudey left a comment
Member
Copy Link

Works great! I'll wait for Daniel's approval to commit this.

Works great! I'll wait for Daniel's approval to commit this.
Hans Goudey commented 2024-04-16 18:11:32 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

@blender-bot package

@blender-bot package
Blender Bot commented 2024-04-16 18:11:35 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Package build started. Download here when ready.

Package build started. [Download here](https://builder.blender.org/download/patch/PR119483) when ready.
Sean Kim added 1 commit 2024-04-17 00:33:22 +02:00
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-lint Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-darwin-x86_64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-darwin-arm64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-linux-x86_64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-windows-amd64 Build done. Details
buildbot/vexp-code-patch-coordinator Build done. Details
f8ac68bfb0 Merge branch 'main' of projects.blender.org:blender/blender into polyline-hide
Hans Goudey commented 2024-04-17 00:37:12 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

@blender-bot package

@blender-bot package
Blender Bot commented 2024-04-17 00:37:14 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Package build started. Download here when ready.

Package build started. [Download here](https://builder.blender.org/download/patch/PR119483) when ready.
Daniel Bystedt approved these changes 2024-04-28 09:26:44 +02:00
Daniel Bystedt left a comment
Member
Copy Link

Works great. Thank you for the commit!

Works great. Thank you for the commit!
Hans Goudey merged commit 55fc1066ac into main 2024-04-29 14:04:28 +02:00
Sean Kim deleted branch polyline-hide 2024-04-30 22:43:17 +02:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Hans Goudey
Daniel Bystedt
Labels
Clear labels   
Interest
Alembic

  
Interest
Animation & Rigging

  
Interest
Asset Browser

  
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview

  
Interest
Audio

  
Interest
Automated Testing

  
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle

  
Interest
BlendFile

  
Interest
Collada

  
Interest
Compatibility
This issue affects/is about backward or forward compatibility

  
Interest
Compositing

  
Interest
Core

  
Interest
Cycles

  
Interest
Dependency Graph

  
Interest
Development Management

  
Interest
EEVEE

  
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport

  
Interest
Freestyle

  
Interest
Geometry Nodes

  
Interest
Grease Pencil

  
Interest
ID Management

  
Interest
Images & Movies

  
Interest
Import Export

  
Interest
Line Art

  
Interest
Masking

  
Interest
Metal

  
Interest
Modeling

  
Interest
Modifiers

  
Interest
Motion Tracking

  
Interest
Nodes & Physics

  
Interest
OpenGL

  
Interest
Overlay

  
Interest
Overrides

  
Interest
Performance

  
Interest
Physics

  
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO

  
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests

  
Interest
Python API

  
Interest
Render & Cycles

  
Interest
Render Pipeline

  
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture

  
Interest
Text Editor

  
Interest
Translations

  
Interest
Triaging

  
Interest
Undo

  
Interest
USD

  
Interest
User Interface

  
Interest
UV Editing

  
Interest
VFX & Video

  
Interest
Video Sequencer

  
Interest
Virtual Reality

  
Interest
Vulkan

  
Interest
Wayland
Issues relating to Wayland windowing support.

  
Interest
Workbench

  
Interest: X11

Issues relating to Xorg/X11 support.

  
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project

  
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser

  
Legacy
OpenGL Error

  
Meta
Good First Issue

  
Meta
Papercut

  
Meta
Retrospective

  
Meta
Security
Issues relating to security: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Process/Vulnerability_Reports

  
Module
Animation & Rigging

  
Module
Core

  
Module
Development Management

  
Module
EEVEE & Viewport

  
Module
Grease Pencil

  
Module
Modeling

  
Module
Nodes & Physics

  
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO

  
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests

  
Module
Python API

  
Module
Render & Cycles

  
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture

  
Module
Triaging

  
Module
User Interface

  
Module
VFX & Video

  
Platform
FreeBSD

  
Platform
Linux

  
Platform
macOS

  
Platform
Windows

  
Priority
High

  
Priority
Low

  
Priority
Normal

  
Priority
Unbreak Now!

  
Status
Archived

  
Status
Confirmed

  
Status
Duplicate

  
Status
Needs Info from Developers

  
Status
Needs Information from User

  
Status
Needs Triage

  
Status
Resolved

  
Type
Bug

  
Type
Design

  
Type
Known Issue

  
Type
Patch

  
Type
Report

  
Type
To Do

No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#119483
No description provided.
Delete Branch "Sean-Kim/blender:polyline-hide"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?